Overview of the Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to JENER Journal undergo a double-blind peer-review process. This begins with a plagiarism check and an initial editorial review. Once accepted, the editor gathers comments from at least two reviewers.

JENER Journal Review Criteria

• Originality and novelty of the research.
• Clarity, structure, and language.
• Ethical standards and data integrity.
• Conflicts of interest.

Decisions Made

• The paper is accepted with no revisions.
• The paper is accepted with revisions.
• The paper is rejected

Embargo Period for a Rejected Article

A rejected article is not eligible for resubmission for six months. This embargo period ensures that authors have sufficient time to address the fundamental issues highlighted by making revisions made based on reviewer comments.

Responsibility of Editors

• Ensure timely and efficient review process.
• Select appropriate and expert reviewers.
• Make objective decisions based on merit.
• Maintain confidentiality of the review process.
• Ensure adherance to the ethical guidelines.

Responsibility of Reviewers

• Provide objective assessment of manuscripts.
• Offer constructive criticism and feedback.
• Identify any ethical concerns.
• Report any potential conflicts of interest.
• Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript.